| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 11 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 19 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 0.00-100.00 (cM)
|
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
| Peak: | |
| Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | |
| Analysis type: | Association |
| Model tested: | Mendelian |
| Test base: | n/a |
| Threshold significance level: | Significant |
 |
P_values | 0.003 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | n/a |
| Associated Gene: | FTO (fat mass and obesity associated) |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #17054
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | Birds were from an F(2) resource population consisting of a reciprocal cross between White Recessive Rock and Xinghua chickens. |
| Breeds associated:
n/a
|
| Design: | Birds were genotyped for 18 SNPs in FTO and analyzed for growth, body composition, and fatness traits. |
| Analysis: | The general linear model procedure was used. |
| Software: | Haploview, SAS |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Jia X, Nie Q, Lamont SJ, Zhang X |
| Affiliation: | 1] College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China [2] Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, Guangzhou, China |
| Title: | Variation in sequence and expression of the avian FTO, and association with glucose metabolism, body weight, fatness and body composition in chickens |
| Journal: | Int J Obes (Lond), 2012, 36(8): 1054-61 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
| Additional Information |
|---|
| Comments: | semi-eviscerated weight: includes head, neck, feet, lungs, kidneys, glandular stomach and muscular stomach (except for the stomach horny membrane and contents), heart, liver (excluding the gallbladder) and abdominal fat |
User inputs on reference #22105519
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
