Release 56
(Apr 24, 2025)

Reference # 11219443 Details:

Authors:Gerbens F, Verburg FJ, Van Moerkerk HT, Engel B, Buist W, Veerkamp JH, te PasMF.
Affiliation:Department of Genetics and Reproduction, Institute for Animal Science andHealth, ID-Lelystad, The Netherlands. Contact: f.gerbens@id.wag-ur.nl
Title:Associations of heart and adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein gene expressionwith intramuscular fat content in pigs.
Journal:J Anim Sci, 2001, 79(2):347-54 DOI: 10.2527/2001.792347x
Abstract:

Intramuscular fat content is a major determinant of meat quality in pigs.Previously, polymorphisms in the adipocyte and heart fatty acid-binding proteingenes, A-FABP and H-FABP, have been significantly associated with geneticvariation of intramuscular fat content in a Duroc pig population. Furthersupport for the role of H-FABP but not for A-FABP was found in a Meishancrossbred population. However, the effect of closely linked genes could not beexcluded in these analyses. To validate the role of A-FABP and H-FABP inintramuscular fat accretion, 153 pigs of a crossbred genotype were evaluated forthe A-FABP and H-FABP polymorphisms, mRNA, and protein expression levels of bothFABP genes and intramuscular fat content in the longissimus lumborum muscle. ForH-FABP, statistical analyses showed significant differences in mRNA but notprotein expression levels between H-FABP HaeIII PCR-RFLP genotype classes.Between these genotype classes, significant differences in intramuscular fatcontent were found within barrows but not in gilts. Moreover, H-FABP mRNA butnot protein expression levels were significantly related to intramuscular fatcontent. For A-FABP genotype classes, no significant differences in mRNA andprotein expression levels were found. However, a significant difference inintramuscular fat content was found within barrows but not in gilts. Inaddition, a significant relationship between A-FABP mRNA but not proteinexpression levels and intramuscular fat content was found. In conclusion,variation of intramuscular fat content could not be explained by differences inA-FABP and H-FABP mRNA and protein expression levels. However, this may be dueto limitations of the assays used and(or) the inappropriateness of the time ofsampling. Finally, results suggest that A-FABP and H-FABP expression aretranslationally rather than transcriptionally regulated.

Links:   PubMed | List Data  

 

 

© 2003-2025: USA · USDA · NRPSP8 · Program to Accelerate Animal Genomics Applications. Contact: Bioinformatics Team